Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  40 / 118 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 40 / 118 Next Page
Page Background

S40

vimento de trabalho de pesquisa para compreender o fun-

cionamento das redes de investigação em saúde, bem como

dos processos de translação e aplicação do conhecimento

científico produzido.

Apesar do enorme crescimento dos estudos de redes, estes

reproduzem principalmente a quantificação das citações e

co-autorias com base em técnicas bibliométricas e ciencio-

métricas (Leite 2014). Por este motivo, há necessidade de

usar novas estratégias multi metodológicas para medir os

impactos científicos e sociais da ciência (Falk-Krzesinski

et al

2010) e ir além das métricas convencionais, incluindo diver-

sos indicadores de produção como por exemplo literatura

cinzenta, relatórios de pesquisa, resumos de políticas, que

têm potencial impacto na política de saúde.

Bibliografia

1.Adams, Jonathan (2012.) Collaborations:The rise of research networks. Nature

490 335–336 (18 October 2012) doi:10.1038/490335a

2. Bennett G., Jessani, N. (2011).The knowledge translation toolkit: bridging the

know-do gap: a resource for researchers. Sage. ISBN: 978-81-321-0585-5 (PB).

3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (2012). Guide to knowledge

Translation Planning at CIHR: Integrated and End-of-Grant Approaches.

4. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (2005).

About knowledge translation.

Re-

trieved September 9, 2006, from

http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/29418.html

5. Cressman D, Holbrook JA, Lewis BS,Wixted B. (2009a). Capturing the outco-

mes and impacts of publicly funded research: a framework for evaluation formal

research networks.Vancouver; 6(5): 1-38.

6. Cressman D. (2009b). A Brief Overview of Actor-Network Theory: Punctua-

lization, Heterogeneous Engineering & Translation ACT Lab/Centre for Policy

Research on Science & Technology (CPROST) School of Communication, Simon

Fraser University.

7. Falk-Krzesinski, H. J., Börner, K., Contractor, N., Cummings, J., Fiore, S.

M., Hall, K. L., Uzzi, B. (2010). Advancing the Science of Team Science. Clini-

cal and Translational Science, 3(5), 263–266.

http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-

8062.2010.00223.x

8. Figueiró AC, dos Santos MP, Kabad J, da Cruz MM, Hartz, Z: A avaliação da rede

PDTSP-Teias: contribuição ao debate sobre construção do conhecimento e de produtos

para o SUS. In Rede de pesquisa em Manguinhos: sociedade, gestores e pesquisadores

em conexão com o SUS. Hucitec Editora, 2016, 293-322. ISBN: 978-058404-079-7

9.Freeman, C. (1991),‘Networks of innovators:A synthesis of research issues’,

Research Policy, 20,5, 499-514.

10. Hartz Z.M.A., Santos M.E. e Matida,A.H. (2007). Promovendo e analisando o

uso e a influência das pesquisas avaliativas – desafios e oportunidades ao se institu-

cionalizar a avaliação em saúde.

11. International Development Research Centre (2006). IDRC and Research Ne-

tworks: Allies for Development. IDRC, Ottawa, ON, CA. Evaluation highlight,

11:1-6.

12. Lavis J., Lomas J., Hamid M. e Sevankambo N. (2006). “Assessing country-

-levels Efforts to Link Research to Action”. Bulletin of the World health Organi-

zation, 84: 620-628.

13. Robertson, M and Swan, J. (2011). Knowledge, networking and innovation:

Developing the process perspective.

14.Roy M, Parent R, Desmarais and L. Knowledge (2003). Networking:A Strategy

to ImproveWorkplace Health & Safety Knowledge Transfer. Electronic Journal on

Knowledge Management. 1(2): 159-166.

15. Scarbrough H, D’Andreta D, Evans S, Marabelli M, Newell S, Powell J, Swan J.

(2014). Networked innovation in the health sector: comparative qualitative study

of the role of Collaborations for Leadership inApplied Health Research and Care in

translating research into practice. Health Services and Delivery Research Volume:

2 Issue: 13

16. Sudsawad, P. (2007). Knowledge translation: Introduction to models, strate-

gies, and measures. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory,

National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research.

http://ktdrr.org/

ktlibrary/articles_pubs/ktmodels/index.html#know

17.Wixted B. and Holbrook,A. (2008).Conceptual Issues in the Evaluation of For-

mal Research Networks. CPROST Report 2008 -

http://www.sfu.ca/cprost-old/

docs/NetworkEvaluation.pdf)

Gestão, meta-avaliação e redes de conhecimento