Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  104 / 119 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 104 / 119 Next Page
Page Background

S104

Artigo de Revisão

ties set in low and middle income countries? A systematic review of published reports.

PLoS One 9(9): e108787.

9.

CarvalhoA, Nunes JA (2013).Technology, Methodology and Intervention: Perfor-

ming Nanoethics in Portugal. Nanoethics 7 (2): 149–160.

10.

World Health Organization (2007). Sixtieth World Health Assembly. Eleventh

plenary meeting, 23 May 2007 – Committee B, second report. Consultado em 10

de Setembro de 2017. In:

http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHASSA_

WHA60-Rec1/E/reso-60-en.pdf

11.

Council of International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) (2016).

International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research involving Humans. Con-

sultado em 10 de Setembro de 2017. In:

http://cioms.ch/ethical-guidelines-2016/

WEB-CIOMS-EthicalGuidelines.pdf

12.

Montorzi G, De Haan S, IJsselmuiden C (2010). Priority setting for research for

health. A management process for countries. Geneva: COHRED. Consultado em 10

de Setembro de 2017. In:

http://www.cohred.org/downloads/Priority_Setting_CO-

HRED_approach_August_2010.pdf

13.

Khan et al. (2017). Assessing of R&D priority setting processes for neglected

diseases. Global Observatory on Health R&D Working paper series 1 (preliminary

draft). Consultado em 10 de Setembro de 2017. In:

http://www.who.int/research-

-observatory/resources/methods/gohrd_working_paper_series1.pdf

14.

White G,Birkel R (1989).Low Priority of Research on Stress-Related Disorders

Questioned. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 27(11): 3-36.

15.

Tomlinson M et al. (2009). Setting priorities for global mental health research.

BullWorld Health Organ 87 (6): 438-446.

16.

FusterV et al (2007). Low priority of cardiovascular and chronic diseases on the

global health agenda: a cause for concern. Circulation 116: 1966-1970.

17.

Commission for Research Partnerships with Developing Countries (KFPE)

(2014). A Guide for Transboundary Research Partnerships. Consultado em 11 de

setembro de 20017. In:

https://naturalsciences.ch/organisations/kfpe/11_princi-

ples_7_questions

18.

CarvalhoA et al.(2017).A implementação da Iniciativa para a Equidade na Inves-

tigação.Anais do Instituto de Higiene e MedicinaTropical 16 (Supl. 2), 11-20.

19.

Small R et al.(1999).Cross-cultural research:Trying to do it better.2:Enhancing

data quality.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 23(4): 390-395.

20.

ESSENCE (2014). Seven principles for strengthening research capacity in low-

and middle-income countries: simple ideas in a complex world. Consultado em 11 de

Setembro de 2017. In:

http://www.who.int/tdr/publications/Essence_report2014_

OK.pdf

21.

NobesA (2017). Challenges faced by early career researchers in low and middle

income countries – how can we support them? Consultado em 11 de Setembro de

2017. In:

http://gheg-journal.co.uk/2017/01/challenges-faced-early-career-resear-

chers-lmics-support/

22.

Uduma O. et al. (2014). Research Capacity Building inAfrica: Perceived Streng-

ths,Weaknesses, Opportunities andThreats Impacting on the DoctoralTraining for De-

velopment Programme inAfrica. In: Brennan L. (eds) Enacting Globalization. Palgrave

Macmillan, London, 43-53.

23.

Marais D et al. (2013).Where there is no lawyer: Guidance for fairer contract

negotiation in collaborative research partnerships.Geneva:Council on Health Research

for Development. Consultado em 11 de Setembro de 2017. In:

http://www.cohred

.

org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Fair-Research-Contracting-Guidance-Booklet-e-

-version.pdf

24.

Larkan F et al. (2016). Developing a framework for successful research partner-

ships in global health. Glob Health. 12:17. Doi: 10.1186/s12992-016-0152-1

25.

IDeA Networks of Biomedical Research Excellence (INBRE) (2017). Conflict

Resolution Policy. Consultado em 11 de Setembro de 2017. In:

http://www.nminbre

.

org/index.php/conflict-resolution-policy

26.

Bagshaw D et al. (2007) International research collaboration: Building teams and

managing conflicts. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 24: 433–446.

27.

Carvalho A (2017) Ecologies of the Self in Practice - meditation, affect and eco-

sophy. GeografiskaAnnaler: Series B, Human Geography 99 (2): 207-222.

28.

Carvalho A (2014) Subjectivity, Ecology and Meditation: Performing Intercon-

nectedness Subjectivity 7 (2): 131-150.

29.

Bammer G (2008). Enhancing research collaborations:Three key management

challenges. Research Policy. 37(5):875-887.

30.

Research Councils UK (RCUK) (2014).RCUK Pathways to Impact.Consultado

em 11 de Setembro de 2017. In:

http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/innovation/impacts/

31.

Buxton M, Hanney S, JonesT (2004). Estimating the economic value to societies

of the impact of health research: a critical review. Bulletin of theWorld Health Organi-

sation 82: 733-739.

32.

Darby S (2017). Making space for co-produced research‘impact’: learning from

a participatory action research case study.Area 49: 230–237.

33.

Jasanoff S. (2003). Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing

science.

Minerva

41:223-244.

34.

Commission on Health Research for Development (HRfD) (1990). Health Re-

search: Essential Link to Equity in Development. NewYork, Oxford University Press.

35.

Webb D et al. (2015). Co-financing for health and development – an affordable

innovation. Consultado em 11 de Setembro de 2017. In:

http://www.undp.org/con-

tent/undp/en/home/blog/2015/7/13/Co-financing-for-health-and-development-

-an-affordable-innovation.html

36.

Edejer TTT (1999). North-South research partnerships: the ethics of carrying

out research in developing countries. BMJ. 319:438-41.

37.

European Commission (2015a). Rethinking the blueprint forAfrican-EU resear-

ch

.

Consultado em 11 de Setembro de 2017. In:

https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/

horizon2020/en/news/rethinking-blueprint-african-eu-research

38.

European Commission (2015b). Lessons in Co-financing: Second Phase of ERA-

frica Planned.Consultado em 11 de Setembro de

2017.In :https://caast-net-plus.org/

story/9

39.

OECD (2011). Opportunities, Challenges and Good Practices in International

Research Cooperation between Developed and Developing. Consultado em 11 de Se-

tembro de 2017. In:

https://www.oecd.org/sti/sci-tech/47737209.pdf

40.

GAVI (2017).Gavi Co-financing Policy.Consultado em11 de Setembro de 2017.

In:

http://www.gavi.org/about/programme-policies/co-financing/

41.

WHO (2015). Fiscal space, public finance management and health financing:A

collaborative agenda. Consultado em 11 de Setembro de 2017. In:

http://apps.who.

int/iris/bitstream/10665/153947/5/9789241508506_eng.pdf

42.

Glassman A et al. (2012). Priority setting institutions and health recommenda-

tions from a center for global development working group. Global Health. 7(1): 13

- 34.

43.

Acharya T (2007). Science and technology for wealth and health in developing

countries. Global Public Health 2: 53-63.

44.

Institut français de recherche pour le développement (IRD) (2014). Reinforcing

the research capacities of scientific communities in the South. Consultado em 11 de

Setembro de 2017. In:

http://en.ird.fr/partnerships/capacity-building

45.

Ogundahunsi OAT et al. (2015). Strengthening Research Capacity—TDR’s

Evolving Experience in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. PLoS NeglTrop Dis 9(1):

e3380.

46.

Dean L et al. (2015). Promoting sustainable research partnerships: a mixed-

-method evaluation of a United Kingdom-Africa capacity strengthening award scheme.

Health Research Policy and Systems 13 (81). doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0071-2

47.

Selby-Harrington M et al. (1993). Guidance for managing a research grant. Nur-

sing Res. 41 (1): 54–58.

48.

Beran D et al. (2017). Research capacity building—obligations for global health

partners.The Lancet Global Health 5(6): 567-568.

49.

IJsselmuiden C et al.(2012). Africa’s neglected area of human resources for heal-

th research—the way forward. SAfr Med J 102: 236-41.

50.

Chu KM et al. (2014). Building research capacity in Africa: equity and global

health collaborations. PLoS Med 11: e1001612.

51.

Bates I et al.(2006).Evaluating Health Research Capacity Building:An Evidence-

-BasedTool. PLoS Med 3(8): e299.

52.

The Asia Foundation (2009). Financial Management Capacity Building: A com-

mitment to partners. Consultado em 11 de Setembro de 2017. In: https://asiafounda-

tion.org/resources/pdfs/IDFinanceGrants.pdf

53.

AccountAnts for business (ACCA) (2010). Improving public sector financial

management in developing countries and emerging economies. Consultado em 11 de

Setembro de 2017. In:

http://www.accaglobal.com/content/dam/acca/global/PDF-

-technical/public-sector/tech-afb-ipsfm.pdf

54.

Klingebiel S,MahnTC (2011). Briefing Paper 3/2011 - Reforming public finan-

cial management systems in developing countries as a contribution to the improvement

of governance. Consultado em 11 de Setembro de 2017. In:

https://www.die-gdi.de/

uploads/media/BP_3.2011.pdf

55.

Claussen C (2012). Capacity Building for Financial Management: A Literature

Review. UnitedWay of Calgary and Area. Consultado em 11 de Setembro de 2017.

In:

http://www.calgaryunitedway.org/images/uwca/our-work/supporting-non-

-profits/capacity-building/capacity_building_for_financial_management.pdf

56.

Stanford University (2017).Your role in financial management. Consultado em

11 de Setembro de 2017. In:

https://doresearch.stanford.edu/research-scholarship/

pi-financial-basics/your-role-financial-management

57.

Edwards D et al. (2014). Negotiating Research Contracts – Creating Opportu-

nities for Stronger Research and Innovation Systems. Council on Health Research for

Development. Consultado em 11 de Setembro de 2017. In:

http://www.cohred.org/

wp-content/uploads/2014/06/COHRED-negotiationbookletv-web.pdf

58.

Foucault M (1995). Discipline and Punish. NewYork: Pantheon Books.

59.

Scott J (1998). Seeing like a State. New Haven, Connecticut:Yale University

Press.

60.

Felt U (2017). Under the Shadow ofTime:Where Indicators and AcademicVa-

lues Meet. Engaging Science,Technology, and Society 3: 53-63.

61.

Santos BS (2003). Reconhecer para libertar: os caminhos do cosmopolitanismo

multicultural. Rio de Janeiro, Civilização Brasileira.

62.

Jasanoff S (2005). Designs on Nature. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton Univer-

sity Press.

63.

Santos PereiraT, CarvalhoA, Fonseca P (2016). Imaginaries of nuclear energy in

the Portuguese parliament: Between promise, risk, and democracy. Public Understan-

ding of Science 26 (3): 289-306.