S104
Artigo de Revisão
ties set in low and middle income countries? A systematic review of published reports.
PLoS One 9(9): e108787.
9.
CarvalhoA, Nunes JA (2013).Technology, Methodology and Intervention: Perfor-
ming Nanoethics in Portugal. Nanoethics 7 (2): 149–160.
10.
World Health Organization (2007). Sixtieth World Health Assembly. Eleventh
plenary meeting, 23 May 2007 – Committee B, second report. Consultado em 10
de Setembro de 2017. In:
http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHASSA_WHA60-Rec1/E/reso-60-en.pdf
11.
Council of International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) (2016).
International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research involving Humans. Con-
sultado em 10 de Setembro de 2017. In:
http://cioms.ch/ethical-guidelines-2016/WEB-CIOMS-EthicalGuidelines.pdf
12.
Montorzi G, De Haan S, IJsselmuiden C (2010). Priority setting for research for
health. A management process for countries. Geneva: COHRED. Consultado em 10
de Setembro de 2017. In:
http://www.cohred.org/downloads/Priority_Setting_CO-HRED_approach_August_2010.pdf
13.
Khan et al. (2017). Assessing of R&D priority setting processes for neglected
diseases. Global Observatory on Health R&D Working paper series 1 (preliminary
draft). Consultado em 10 de Setembro de 2017. In:
http://www.who.int/research--observatory/resources/methods/gohrd_working_paper_series1.pdf
14.
White G,Birkel R (1989).Low Priority of Research on Stress-Related Disorders
Questioned. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 27(11): 3-36.
15.
Tomlinson M et al. (2009). Setting priorities for global mental health research.
BullWorld Health Organ 87 (6): 438-446.
16.
FusterV et al (2007). Low priority of cardiovascular and chronic diseases on the
global health agenda: a cause for concern. Circulation 116: 1966-1970.
17.
Commission for Research Partnerships with Developing Countries (KFPE)
(2014). A Guide for Transboundary Research Partnerships. Consultado em 11 de
setembro de 20017. In:
https://naturalsciences.ch/organisations/kfpe/11_princi-ples_7_questions
18.
CarvalhoA et al.(2017).A implementação da Iniciativa para a Equidade na Inves-
tigação.Anais do Instituto de Higiene e MedicinaTropical 16 (Supl. 2), 11-20.
19.
Small R et al.(1999).Cross-cultural research:Trying to do it better.2:Enhancing
data quality.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 23(4): 390-395.
20.
ESSENCE (2014). Seven principles for strengthening research capacity in low-
and middle-income countries: simple ideas in a complex world. Consultado em 11 de
Setembro de 2017. In:
http://www.who.int/tdr/publications/Essence_report2014_OK.pdf
21.
NobesA (2017). Challenges faced by early career researchers in low and middle
income countries – how can we support them? Consultado em 11 de Setembro de
2017. In:
http://gheg-journal.co.uk/2017/01/challenges-faced-early-career-resear-chers-lmics-support/
22.
Uduma O. et al. (2014). Research Capacity Building inAfrica: Perceived Streng-
ths,Weaknesses, Opportunities andThreats Impacting on the DoctoralTraining for De-
velopment Programme inAfrica. In: Brennan L. (eds) Enacting Globalization. Palgrave
Macmillan, London, 43-53.
23.
Marais D et al. (2013).Where there is no lawyer: Guidance for fairer contract
negotiation in collaborative research partnerships.Geneva:Council on Health Research
for Development. Consultado em 11 de Setembro de 2017. In:
http://www.cohred.
org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Fair-Research-Contracting-Guidance-Booklet-e-
-version.pdf
24.
Larkan F et al. (2016). Developing a framework for successful research partner-
ships in global health. Glob Health. 12:17. Doi: 10.1186/s12992-016-0152-1
25.
IDeA Networks of Biomedical Research Excellence (INBRE) (2017). Conflict
Resolution Policy. Consultado em 11 de Setembro de 2017. In:
http://www.nminbre.
org/index.php/conflict-resolution-policy
26.
Bagshaw D et al. (2007) International research collaboration: Building teams and
managing conflicts. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 24: 433–446.
27.
Carvalho A (2017) Ecologies of the Self in Practice - meditation, affect and eco-
sophy. GeografiskaAnnaler: Series B, Human Geography 99 (2): 207-222.
28.
Carvalho A (2014) Subjectivity, Ecology and Meditation: Performing Intercon-
nectedness Subjectivity 7 (2): 131-150.
29.
Bammer G (2008). Enhancing research collaborations:Three key management
challenges. Research Policy. 37(5):875-887.
30.
Research Councils UK (RCUK) (2014).RCUK Pathways to Impact.Consultado
em 11 de Setembro de 2017. In:
http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/innovation/impacts/31.
Buxton M, Hanney S, JonesT (2004). Estimating the economic value to societies
of the impact of health research: a critical review. Bulletin of theWorld Health Organi-
sation 82: 733-739.
32.
Darby S (2017). Making space for co-produced research‘impact’: learning from
a participatory action research case study.Area 49: 230–237.
33.
Jasanoff S. (2003). Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing
science.
Minerva
41:223-244.
34.
Commission on Health Research for Development (HRfD) (1990). Health Re-
search: Essential Link to Equity in Development. NewYork, Oxford University Press.
35.
Webb D et al. (2015). Co-financing for health and development – an affordable
innovation. Consultado em 11 de Setembro de 2017. In:
http://www.undp.org/con-tent/undp/en/home/blog/2015/7/13/Co-financing-for-health-and-development-
-an-affordable-innovation.html
36.
Edejer TTT (1999). North-South research partnerships: the ethics of carrying
out research in developing countries. BMJ. 319:438-41.
37.
European Commission (2015a). Rethinking the blueprint forAfrican-EU resear-
ch
.
Consultado em 11 de Setembro de 2017. In:
https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/news/rethinking-blueprint-african-eu-research
38.
European Commission (2015b). Lessons in Co-financing: Second Phase of ERA-
frica Planned.Consultado em 11 de Setembro de
2017.In :https://caast-net-plus.org/story/9
39.
OECD (2011). Opportunities, Challenges and Good Practices in International
Research Cooperation between Developed and Developing. Consultado em 11 de Se-
tembro de 2017. In:
https://www.oecd.org/sti/sci-tech/47737209.pdf40.
GAVI (2017).Gavi Co-financing Policy.Consultado em11 de Setembro de 2017.
In:
http://www.gavi.org/about/programme-policies/co-financing/41.
WHO (2015). Fiscal space, public finance management and health financing:A
collaborative agenda. Consultado em 11 de Setembro de 2017. In:
http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/153947/5/9789241508506_eng.pdf
42.
Glassman A et al. (2012). Priority setting institutions and health recommenda-
tions from a center for global development working group. Global Health. 7(1): 13
- 34.
43.
Acharya T (2007). Science and technology for wealth and health in developing
countries. Global Public Health 2: 53-63.
44.
Institut français de recherche pour le développement (IRD) (2014). Reinforcing
the research capacities of scientific communities in the South. Consultado em 11 de
Setembro de 2017. In:
http://en.ird.fr/partnerships/capacity-building45.
Ogundahunsi OAT et al. (2015). Strengthening Research Capacity—TDR’s
Evolving Experience in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. PLoS NeglTrop Dis 9(1):
e3380.
46.
Dean L et al. (2015). Promoting sustainable research partnerships: a mixed-
-method evaluation of a United Kingdom-Africa capacity strengthening award scheme.
Health Research Policy and Systems 13 (81). doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0071-2
47.
Selby-Harrington M et al. (1993). Guidance for managing a research grant. Nur-
sing Res. 41 (1): 54–58.
48.
Beran D et al. (2017). Research capacity building—obligations for global health
partners.The Lancet Global Health 5(6): 567-568.
49.
IJsselmuiden C et al.(2012). Africa’s neglected area of human resources for heal-
th research—the way forward. SAfr Med J 102: 236-41.
50.
Chu KM et al. (2014). Building research capacity in Africa: equity and global
health collaborations. PLoS Med 11: e1001612.
51.
Bates I et al.(2006).Evaluating Health Research Capacity Building:An Evidence-
-BasedTool. PLoS Med 3(8): e299.
52.
The Asia Foundation (2009). Financial Management Capacity Building: A com-
mitment to partners. Consultado em 11 de Setembro de 2017. In: https://asiafounda-
tion.org/resources/pdfs/IDFinanceGrants.pdf53.
AccountAnts for business (ACCA) (2010). Improving public sector financial
management in developing countries and emerging economies. Consultado em 11 de
Setembro de 2017. In:
http://www.accaglobal.com/content/dam/acca/global/PDF--technical/public-sector/tech-afb-ipsfm.pdf
54.
Klingebiel S,MahnTC (2011). Briefing Paper 3/2011 - Reforming public finan-
cial management systems in developing countries as a contribution to the improvement
of governance. Consultado em 11 de Setembro de 2017. In:
https://www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/BP_3.2011.pdf
55.
Claussen C (2012). Capacity Building for Financial Management: A Literature
Review. UnitedWay of Calgary and Area. Consultado em 11 de Setembro de 2017.
In:
http://www.calgaryunitedway.org/images/uwca/our-work/supporting-non--profits/capacity-building/capacity_building_for_financial_management.pdf
56.
Stanford University (2017).Your role in financial management. Consultado em
11 de Setembro de 2017. In:
https://doresearch.stanford.edu/research-scholarship/pi-financial-basics/your-role-financial-management
57.
Edwards D et al. (2014). Negotiating Research Contracts – Creating Opportu-
nities for Stronger Research and Innovation Systems. Council on Health Research for
Development. Consultado em 11 de Setembro de 2017. In:
http://www.cohred.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/COHRED-negotiationbookletv-web.pdf
58.
Foucault M (1995). Discipline and Punish. NewYork: Pantheon Books.
59.
Scott J (1998). Seeing like a State. New Haven, Connecticut:Yale University
Press.
60.
Felt U (2017). Under the Shadow ofTime:Where Indicators and AcademicVa-
lues Meet. Engaging Science,Technology, and Society 3: 53-63.
61.
Santos BS (2003). Reconhecer para libertar: os caminhos do cosmopolitanismo
multicultural. Rio de Janeiro, Civilização Brasileira.
62.
Jasanoff S (2005). Designs on Nature. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton Univer-
sity Press.
63.
Santos PereiraT, CarvalhoA, Fonseca P (2016). Imaginaries of nuclear energy in
the Portuguese parliament: Between promise, risk, and democracy. Public Understan-
ding of Science 26 (3): 289-306.