Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  127 / 188 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 127 / 188 Next Page
Page Background

Health systems in transition

Portugal

127

allowing the substitution of prescribed drugs by generics at the pharmacy under

certain conditions; this substitution may be refused by the physician, who has

to provide a justification in the prescription, and refusal is also an option for the

patient (Law No. 11/2012, of 8 March 2012). Moreover, pharmacies are forced

by law to have available at least three of the five lowest-price generics in each

class defined by a branded product.

The continuing trend of declining prices among pharmaceutical products

has reduced revenues to pharmacies and wholesalers, as their revenues result

from a regressive margin on the price of the product. The measures highlighted

above contributed to reduce pharmaceutical prices and pharmacy revenues, and,

as a result, pharmacies have claimed to face difficult economic and financial

conditions, including refusals by wholesalers to sell to them due to delays of

payment by pharmacies.

5.6.4 Distribution of pharmaceutical products

The wholesale and retail distribution of pharmaceutical products was also

addressed in the MoU. Historically, retail pharmacies and wholesale distributors

earned a margin over the price paid by consumers. The MoU stipulated that

a new structure of margins, using a combination of fixed fees and regressive

margins over the wholesale price must be defined (MoU, 2011). Before the

new legislation package enacted for this purpose, the pharmaceutical wholesale

margin was 8% and the retail pharmacy margin was 20%, both over the final

price (at the consumer level). These margins had been the subject of much

discussion over the years and by the end of 2010 and early 2011, the possibility

of moving to a different system of margins was mooted. Therefore, the MoU

proposal to combine regressive margins and fixed fees was expected.

One of the aims of this change was to save €50 million in distribution costs,

as reported in some versions of the MoU. The savings target is reinforced by the

requirement for wholesalers and retail pharmacies to pay a special contribution

(claw-back) if not enough savings are generated (although pharmacies in remote

areas with low turnover may be exempt from this pay-back mechanism).

A second objective of the margin change is to increase the incentives to

pharmacies to offer patients the option of purchasing generics. Under the

previous system, where margins were defined by constant percentage over the

final price, pharmacies had the incentive to favour the dispensing of products

with higher prices. Hence, the new rules mitigate this relative incentive to

dispense more expensive products (by not carrying generic products), resulting

in a decrease of prices.